A Discussion about Matter, part three

A quick recap, using Paul’s snappy titles:

And now:

Jonathan: It occurred to me a while back that ideology seems to have drained out of SF. Heinlein’s works may have essentially became fora in which he could appear as an appropriately father-like Mary Sue and then mouth off about whatever political issue was getting his goat at the time, but I think that nowadays genre is struggling to keep in touch with the idea of people being genuinely politically motivated.

The Culture books are weird in that they’re frequently political but the politics aren’t particularly fine-grained. The result is that you have characters working for SC out of a genuine desire to further the political aims of SC but as those aims are frequently unclear, the politics serve quite poorly as character motivation, merely resulting in lots of people being enigmatic and secretive.


3 Responses to “A Discussion about Matter, part three”

  1. Things to Come « Torque Control Says:

    […] the Masterclass reading. There’ll probably also be more discussions, after the fashion of the Matter roundtable, at some […]

  2. A Discussion about Swiftly « Torque Control Says:

    […] Discussion about Swiftly Since the Matter discussion went down so well, I’ve decided to turn it into a regular, or at least semi-regular feature. […]

  3. Iain Banks on Open Book « Torque Control Says:

    […] nobody has seen fit to send me a proof copy this time, so it may be a while before I get to it. Sounds promising, though. Posted in SF. Tags: iain […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: